It’s been quite obvious that the media has a love affair going on with our newly minted and anointed, dumbo eared President. We’ve had to listen to grown men gush and blush and describe the tingles they felt going up and down their legs…now we have the pleasure to read about the media women-whores’ fantasies of hawt sex with him.

Good grief. Is anything off bounds anymore?

One night, New York Times columnist Judith Warner had a dream about the president taking a shower in her house. Then a friend of hers confided that she’d had an Obama dream, too. So, Warner “launched an e-mail inquiry” to suss out whether the president was behind other women’s fluttering eyelids, and she found that he is — in a big way. Women across America are apparently dreaming about schtupping the president.

The steams’ arising over the NYT Building….the media hagbags finding themselves all hawt and horny and flustered- they’ve rediscovered their long dried up sex drives. Hmm. I’d hate to be their husbands. Can one imagine getting an email asking if you’ve had any dreams about sex with teh One? Is this part of the cult of personality?

WTF.

She writes: “In these dreams, the women replaced Michelle with greater or lesser guilt or, in the case of a 62-year-old woman in North Florida, whose dream was reported to me by her daughter, found a fully above-board solution: ‘Michelle had divorced Barack because he had become ‘too much of a star.’ He then married my mother, who was oh so proud to be the first lady,’ the daughter wrote me.”

WTF???

Politics aside, this is over the top. Laughable and shameful- that they would even discuss these things in a national media outlet.

Not only are women mind-sexing Obama, reports Warner, they are also daydreaming about his actual sex life: “Barack and Michelle Obama look like they have sex. They look like they like having sex,” a woman from Los Angeles writes to Warner. “Often. With each other.” I get it. It’s in the way they look at, touch and talk about each other.

Uh, last I read they are married. To each other. And have been. For a long time. They have two daughters…So it’s probably a fact that they do indeed have sex. With each other.

What’s the news on this?

It isn’t just that the Obamas are still, by all appearances, having sex; it’s that and that they’re still good friends. It’s an unfamiliar sight, as one of Warner’s interviewees points out: “These days when the sexless marriage is such a big celebrity in America (and when first couples are icons of rigid propriety), [it's] one interesting mental drama.” It’s apparently making some worry about how their marriage measures up.

***sigh***
I get it now. It’s that Married-People-Sex thing. Or lack of. It is true that many married couples don’t place sex high on their lists of priorities. Especially when they have kids.

But I can also bet that running a campaign, for President, is a sex killer as well. All the time away, on the road…all the stress, lack of sleep, of time together, ALONE, the emotional roller coasters…I bet the Obama’s haven’t had sex in quite some time. Perhaps now they can rekindle whatever might be left of it.

Whatever.

It’s none of our business.

Period.

It’s not Ms. Warner’s place to be writing about these things. And it’s a total shame that she pushes this issue further, by comparing the current first couple to past couples.

My Mother used to tell me how much she admired John Kennedy- she spoke of his handsome looks and youthful ways. She would go on about how much he loved his Jackie…young, attractive, well bred… and how good they looked together. A perfect couple, she would claim. So in love. With each other.

Uh huh.

As history has shown us, Jackie was not enough for JFK- who had endless relationships with a steady stream of women who lined up at the chance. And we all know what Bill Clinton was busy doing and there is strong evidence that he’d been doing those things for many years. It really should not have been our business- but he made it such when he lied. He brought shame to the office of POTUS…and a new generation of media was born.

Who will dare make claim that Nancy and Ronald Reagan (Or the Carters? Or the Bushes, both sets, lol? ) didn’t love one another and consider each other to be best friends? Just because they didn’t lap dance or show passionate kissing doesn’t mean there was no love.

The very words, “first couples are icons of rigid propriety” is very telling. First couples are not expected to showcase their sex lives to the world. The so called rigid propriety is actually a form of respect…and decency. There’s a time and place for gestures of love and affection. Ballroom floors are not places where we expect to see dirty dancing…that’s for bedrooms Ms. Warner.

Leave it to liberal media sluts to break down these barriers and progress the nation further…into a gutter where we read about old women fantasizing about sexual encounters with a younger, apparently happily married President. Politics aside, this is pathetic. Nothing’s sacred anymore.