Why is She Suing Wal Mart?
Posted by Raven on 21st June 2008
What is she suing for? Damages? Explain them to me. Did he have a disability due to the fall- (which is highly unlikely medically speaking)?
HAGERSTOWN, Md. — A Hagerstown woman who filed suit against Wal-Mart is asking for damages for herself and her son, who, she says, was born prematurely after she fell in a store.
Radhia Haj-Mabrouk contends in the suit filed Tuesday in Washington County Circuit Court that she slipped on water on the floor in the Wal-Mart on Garden Groh Boulevard in August 2005, fell and was hurt.
Haj-Mabrouk was pregnant then and her son was delivered by emergency C-section later that day, the suit says.Haj-Mabrouk is seeking $1 million on her behalf and $2 million on behalf of her son, Lofti Haj-Mabrouk, according to the lawsuit.
A Wal-Mart spokeswoman said Friday that Wal-Mart had not yet been served with the lawsuit.
Hmm. I am pretty skeptical on this, simply because of the lack of details. Just because someone falls in a store, doesn’t mean they have a right to sue. ACTUAL HARM must have occurred in order to take legal action. Now, seeking legal remedy for the costs of the emergency delivery might be in order here. The article states “she was hurt”- one would think when it comes to the anti Wal Mart crowds of this country, the gory bloody details would be well known. Then again the Wal Mart haters seem to have disappeared- I wonder if they’re all working for Obama with his campaign.
Posted in American Business, Raven, Weird | 7 Comments »



















