Archive for the 'Islamification' Category

A brief moment of truth slips out from the moongod’s followers:

Omar Bakri Mohammad’s followers in the U.K. held a conference in support of the imposition of Islamic law. A rare moment of clarity:

“Women need to be covered up, men lashed for fornication [outside marriage] and hands cut off for theft and breaking Sharia law,” he said.

When a woman in a burkha asked how he could justify this when Islam was supposed to be a religion of peace, the crowd mocked her. But it was Choudary who rose to put her in her place. “Islam is not a religion of peace,” he said. “It is a religion of submission. We need to submit to the will of Allah.”

Indeed.

Also addressed at the conference was the need for young Muslims to delete extremist videos from their computers. Not for young Muslims to avoid downloading them in the first place, just to be sure to delete them so the police won’t find them when they come a knockin’.

Dr. Shackleford finds another gem with this. I’m just surprised that they feel comfortable enough to come out and tell us exactly how it really is. And somewhat disturbed as well, since that means they fear no retribution in our P.C. environment of any kind. Britain and Eurabia…. so long…

Welcome to the brave new world.

TEHRAN,Iran — Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Thursday congratulated Barack Obama on his election win — the first time an Iranian leader has offered such wishes to a U.S. president-elect since the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

An analyst said the statement was a gesture from the hard-line president that he’s open to some sort of reconciliation with the U.S.

We all know that Barry Hussein stated he is willing to meet with this now co-leader of the not-so-free world. Good. Hope and change coming at us, live and in living color. Staged and scripted for our enjoyment.

I am sure Ahmadinejad has some advice Barry will consider. Ofcourse, he would be more than willing to sell our souls for a handshake with the ole’ Iranian fallguy.

Hmm…Limiting the growth of Islam? Intriguing.

ROME (Reuters) – Italy’s Northern League, allies of centre-right Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, want to limit the growth of Islam in the centre of world Catholicism by blocking the construction of mosques through strict new regulations.

Muslim immigrants using Italy as a route into Europe already get a foretaste of the mistrust with which many Europeans view their religion, with many projects for mosques and prayer halls already blocked by the opposition of local Italian residents.

But if the anti-immigrant Northern League pushes its bill through parliament — where Berlusconi’s coalition has a strong majority — Italy will soon have a new law effectively blocking the construction of new mosques in much of the country.

Where there’s a mosque, there is Islam. Where there is Islam, there is a threat, to some.

Look at Britain…which now allows Islamic law to rule in certain sections of the country.

Seriously, is this a bad thing? Is it religious discrimination? I’m not sure where I stand on this.

With all the attention that media and the blogworld has focused on the Republican convention and sequellae, it’s all to easy to forget that the rest of the world hasn’t stopped in its track, and that the enemies of freedom and democracy and the U.S. continue to prosper.

And from Pakastan comes this reminder of an ancient evil that wraps itself in the mantle of Islam:

Despair among human rights workers in Pakistan over a rash of so-called “honour killings” intensified yesterday when it was disclosed that a girl forced into marriage with a 45-year-old man at the age of nine had been killed by her parents because she asked for an annulment.

The girl, 17, who had been fighting a lonely but successful legal battle, was coming out of court in the Punjabi city of Sahiwal after being granted the annulment by a judge when she was surrounded by a group of men and shot in view of police.

The death of Saira Nusrat Bibi has added further to concerns among human rights campaigners already outraged over the case of five women – among them three teenage schoolgirls – buried alive in the province of Baluchistan because they wanted to marry men of their choice in defiance of the wishes of tribal leaders.

For some reason the article does not go further into the background of Saira’s case, but rather goes on to explain in detail the killings of those other five women, the inaction by authorities, the public defense of the act by a senior member of Pakastan’s parliament, and most recently a reluctant order by the government to launch an investigation in the face of international outcry.

However, I am far more grieved by this tragic outcome of Saira’s incredibly brave effort to single-handedly persist in seeking to strike a blow for her rights and those of millions of other children, challenging the courts to follow the law in the face of fierce pressures from family and neighbors, finding success and international attention, and then brutally struck down, perhaps with connivance of certain elements of the government or police.

A far more detailed description of her case can be found in a story by the Pakistan Press Foundation

In brief, Saira had always opposed the marriage, had entered into a “love affair” with another cousin not defined. When her parents hear of this, they forcible sent Saira to her husband, and had her over jailed on false kidnapping charges to prevent their elopement. Saira then went to court seeking annulment of her marriage, at which time she was threatened by her family and husband. She was able to get placed in protective custody, but after the final hearing at which she was granted annulment, she was shot to death on court premises as she left the court building while accompanied by police. Arrested for the crime were her father, her (never-legally) husband against whom her annulment was granted, a brother and a cousin.

Indeed, I’d call Saira another victim of terrorism driven by the same Islamist and tribal extremism that resulted in 9-11. Indeed, efforts are being made to charge her killers under Pakistan’s Anti-Terrorism Act of 1997.

And checking a listing of recent articles from the Pakistan Press Foundation, women in Pakistan are being assaulted in staggering numbers.

So on this anniversary of the attack on America on 9-11, let us also remember others around the world who have also paid the ultimate price in what we must recognize as a Global War on Terrorism and the perverted theology that fuels it, a movement that will enslave our world if we do not prevail.

:91101:

Once again we have a case of censorship upon us. It seems that book publishers don’t want to offend Muslims. It matters little that the manuscript has been well received; edited; advances paid for. Books, movies and even simple cartoons depicting the Muslim Muhammad in any way as a mere mortal are forbidden. When Muslims read or watch or view these things, they act like madmen. They take to the streets and riot; they set fires, throw stones, make threats, harm and kill people. Perhaps the Religion of Peace should be made to read these books as punishment.

NEW YORK — A racy, historical novel based on the Prophet Muhammad’s child bride A’isha was supposed to hit book stores in the U.S. Tuesday.

But in a rare case of self-censorship to preempt possible violent reaction by Muslims, one of the world’s largest publishing houses pulled the plug on the book just before its release date.

Sherry Jones, author of The Jewel of Medina, said she received word from Random House Inc. that the book’s release would be “postponed indefinitely.” The decision came after copies of her book were sent to stores, her book tour was scheduled and her work of fiction was accepted by the Book of the Month Club (it was scheduled to be in the August selection).

“My book is a respectful portrayal of Islam, of A’isha, of Muhammad. And anyone who reads it with [an] open mind will come away with an understanding of Islam as a peaceful religion,” said the American author.

Well someone’s open eye has been shut. Hmm. I wonder who?

“We felt an obligation to take these concerns very seriously. We consulted with security experts as well as with scholars of Islam, whom we asked to review the book and offer their assessments of potential reactions,” the release stated.

But Jones questions the 11th-hour balk.

“I’m going to tell you there are no terrorist threats against Random House. There was never received any terrorist threat,” she told FOXNews.com.

“By saying that Muslims will be violent, that they can’t intelligently discuss this book, it’s disrespectful to Muslims,” Jones said. “To me, it feels racist for them to say that someone will try to attack them, that someone will try to go after me.”

I wouldn’t be at all surprised if a Muslim threatened or went after Ms. Jones. Not at all. That’s how they are.

Terrorism expert Steven Emerson head of The Investigative Project on Terrorism said Random House’s decision to scrap the book sets a dangerous precedent for freedom of speech.

“This is one of the most despicable episodes of appeasement,” Emerson told FOXNews.com. “You can intimidate publishing and media to not publish anything critical about Islam, and just by an indirect threat of not being happy about it.”

I agree…this is not good. Setting the standards for the future by means of censorship is wrong. And it could come back to bite us.

I don’t like to advocate the profiling of any people. I support it, however, when it comes to the safety of others. As usual, Muslims deserve more scrutiny than others. We already know that young men of middle eastern decent should be watched with very open eyes. Now, we should also be aware of doctors and other medical professionals who are Muslim.

When Iram Qureshi of Dublin, Ohio was dismissed from the West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine last month after having to repeat her first year and then failing two “systems” in her second year after she stopped attending classes, she did what any normal American Muslim woman would seem to do these days – she called the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and sued.

Tragically, perhaps fatally one day for one of her future patients, a Kanawha County Circuit Court judge has granted her a temporary restraining order so that she could resume her “studies” and clinical rotation beginning this month while her dismissal appeal is reviewed, the Charleston Gazette reports. Curiously, the Charleston Gazette waits until half-way through their article before telling readers that the cause of her dismissal was poor academic performance, not religious discrimination.

Her academic failure, however, hasn’t stopped her attorney, James McQueen, from making a series of allegations of religious discrimination in her defense, including her reluctance to conduct chest and pelvic examinations on male subjects. She claims that her alleged persecution grew so bad, she stopped attending classes altogether and is now forced to take anxiety medication.

Oh puleeze. If a person who wishes to be a doctor (or a nurse or any other medical carer) refuses to “work” with certain classes of people, they need to re-think their career choices. Think about this for a moment: A Muslim doctor is treating you. How can you be sure this person is qualified to do so? After all, they can claim religious discrimination in their training and still manage to get their degrees and credentials…and licenses to practice. All without the absolutely vital hands on training and skill sets required. We can thank CAIR for this.

Beware of the health care providers who appear to be of middle eastern decent.

Love and marriage…only if you’re a virgin!

The annulment of a young Muslim couple’s marriage because the bride was not a virgin has caused anger in France, prompting President Sarkozy’s party to call for a change in the law.

The decision by a court in Lille was condemned by the government, media, feminists and civil rights organizations after it was reported in a legal journal on Thursday.

The case, which had previously gone unreported, involved an engineer in his 30s, named only as “Mr. X,” who married “Ms. Y,” a student nurse in her 20s, in 2006.

The wedding night party was still under way at the family’s home in Roubaix when the groom came down from the bedroom complaining that his bride was not a virgin. He could not display the blood-stained sheet that is traditionally exhibited as proof of the bride’s “purity.”

The husband went to court the following morning and was granted an annulment on the grounds that his bride had deceived him on “one of the essential elements” of the marriage. The woman then acknowledged that she had led her groom to believe that she was a virgin when she had already had sexual intercourse. She did not oppose the annulment.

:roll:
So this is love. Muzzie style. This is commitment. Muzzie style. For better or worse; in sickness and health.

SHE is a better person for being “dumped” by the ass; HE is a Muslim man who believes so much in his religion it blinds him to the best things life can offer. Muslim men fear women who might actually like sex and expect their husbands to be good at IT. On a positive note about this article, it was mentioned that feminists have decried this action. We don’t hear too often from our feminatzi friends about these things.

I love the Marines. Everyone knows this.

But when I read this I wanted to go smack them upside their high and tighties.

In a special ceremony, the Pentagon recently promoted a Wahhabi-trained Muslim chaplain who catered to al-Qaida detainees at Guantanamo and fought to establish the first mosque in Marine Corps history.

When we cater to enemies, they stab us in our backs.

Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England personally promoted Navy chaplain Abuhena Mohammed Saifulislam from lieutenant to lieutenant commander. Saifulislam also received a Joint Service Commendation Medal at the Pentagon ceremony held on the fifth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.

The Pentagon has gone completely PC. Like it was before 9-11.

England also earlier this year personally dedicated a new Islamic center at Marine headquarters in Quantico, Va., on the advice of Saifulislam, a Bangladesh immigrant who became a U.S. citizen in 1995.

The Muslim chaplain, who is stationed at Quantico, recited verses from the Quran in Arabic and English at the summer dedication ceremony, which included representatives from the Council on American-Islamic Relations, several leaders of which have been convicted on terrorism-related charges.

Uugh. How can a Marine do this knowing the very people he is praising are actively killing his comrades in a war that is one against an ideology seeking to kill freedom as we know it?

Saifulislam, which is Arabic for “Sword of Islam,” received his religious training at a radical Islamic school raided by federal agents after 9/11. The Graduate School of Islamic and Social Sciences, based in Leesburg, Va., is run by Taha Jaber Al-Alwani, an unindicted co-conspirator in the Sami al-Arian terror case. A federal affidavit used to obtain a warrant to search the school alleges Al-Alwani gave at least $50,000 in jihad money “to support suicide bombings.”

The Marines have a sword as well. Here, the evil sword takes precedent. All to appease those who cry and make noise when we stand up to them, ready to fight back.

“With the Quantico mosque, the Pentagon is facilitating the study of the holy text the enemy uses, heretically or not, as their manual of warfare.”

Saifulislam’s promotion along with the dedication of his new Quantico mosque – the first of its kind in the 230-year history of the Corps – comes on the heels of a Muslim spy scandal at Gitmo involving another Muslim chaplain.

Army Capt. James “Yousef” Yee, who ministered to al-Qaida detainees, was charged with mishandling classified information. Yee, a convert to Islam, quit the Army and the charges were dropped. But two of his Muslim military friends at Gitmo were convicted of espionage-related crimes.

Some say it’s just a few. It was only a few who planned, plotted and carried out those attacks on September 11th.

It’s ironic this these few chaplains and their followers have joined the Few and Proud.

Read the entire article and ask: What’s going on here? And weep for those who truly stand for freedom and who directly fight for it.

What do Obama, Jimmy Carter and HAMAS have in common? They all like one another and HAMAS wants Obama to be the next President of the US.

On the eve of a planned meeting of its leader Khaled Meshaal with former President Jimmy Carter, the Hamas terrorist organization has expressed the “hope” that Senator Barack Hussein Obama will win the presidential elections and change America’s foreign policy.

Even though Obama has said that he would not meet with Hamas unless it renounces violence and recognizes Israel, or becomes the recognized leadership of the Palestinians — he has no qualms about holding talks with the leadership of Iran, Syria, and North Korea — that doesn’t seem to bother the Hamas leadership.

“We like Mr. Obama, and we hope that he will win the elections,” Ahmed Yousuf, Hamas’ top political adviser in the Gaza Strip, said in an exclusive interview with World Net Daily and with the John Batchelor Show on WABC Radio in New York.

Great. The man who has a very good chance of becoming the next President will sell out to the terrorist groups and factions, in the name of peace and good will. Screw the fact that these bastards have killed tens of thousands of innocent Israelis and would think nothing of doing that to Americans.

Gah I hate this shit.

40 infidels, strung like fish beneath symbolic Islamic heavens

Just for this post, a new blogburst logo:

Tom Burnett’s letter to the American people is bringing lots of signatures for our online petition. People can also join our blogbursts here

Damned to Hell

Read the rest of this entry »